PUCE Storage
Stockage entreprise avec déduplication, compression et chiffrement quantum-safe.
Try it — your file, post-quantum encrypted
Real upload with your account: encrypted in the browser (ML-KEM-768) BEFORE it leaves, presigned URL, never through our server.
No objects yet. Upload a file above.
Storage redesigned for the post-quantum era
Three pillars that set PUCE Storage apart from any legacy solution.
Déduplication Intelligente
Élimine les données dupliquées avant compression, réduisant les coûts de stockage jusqu'à 60%.
Multi-Cloud
S'intègre à AWS S3, Azure Blob, Google Cloud Storage et au stockage on-premises.
Compliance
Prêt pour FIPS 140-3, HIPAA, RGPD, LGPD. Outils d'auto-évaluation inclus.
Storage pipeline
5 stages executed on every write operation — fully transparent to the client.
Ingestion
Data arrives via SDK (Python/Node/Rust/Go) or REST API. Each object is split into 64 MB chunks for parallel transfer.
Deduplication & Compression
Inline deduplication via content hashing. High-ratio lossless compression for optimal CPU–space balance. Typical 60–75% reduction in stored volume.
PQ Encryption
Each chunk is encrypted with ML-KEM-768 + AES-256-GCM (FIPS 203). Ephemeral keys never persisted. Optional client-side encryption for zero-knowledge.
Automatic tiering
Hot → Warm → Cold based on access frequency. Transparent migration without URL changes. Configurable retention per bucket (7d – 10 years).
Multi-region replication
Synchronous or asynchronous replication across 3+ regions. Automatic failover. Compliance with data residency requirements (GDPR, NIS2).
Use cases
Four scenarios where PUCE Storage is the obvious choice.
Enterprise backup
Replace legacy backup solutions with PQ-encrypted storage. Deduplication cuts volume by 60-75%. Automatic retention and tiering eliminates manual management.
Regulated data
Healthcare (HIPAA), financial (PCI-DSS) and government (NIS2) data requires strong encryption and audit trail. PUCE Storage provides both by design.
Post-quantum data lake
Store petabytes of analytics data with PQ protection from ingestion. S3-compatible API integrates with Spark, Trino and existing tools.
Legal & forensic archive
Legal documents and forensic evidence need long-term verifiable integrity. SHA3-256 hash + Merkle tree provides tamper-proof evidence.
PUCE Storage vs traditional storage
Six critical differences the auditor will check.
| Feature | PUCE Storage | Traditional storage |
|---|---|---|
| Encryption | ML-KEM-768 + AES-256-GCM | AES-256 (vulnerable to Grover) |
| Quantum resistance | CNSA 2.0 (through 2030+) | None |
| Deduplication | Inline chunk-level | Post-process (if available) |
| Tiering | Automatic Hot/Warm/Cold | Manual or lifecycle rules |
| Integrity | SHA3-256 + Merkle tree | MD5/SHA-256 checksum |
| Multi-region | Sync/async with PQ-TLS | TLS 1.2/1.3 (no PQ) |
Backup software integration scenarios
4 ways to integrate PUCE with any backup system — each with different trade-offs between deduplication, compression and post-quantum protection.
Scenario A — Compress-Only Pre-Backup
Recommended · UniversalApp/DB (100 TB) → PUCE compress-only (30 TB) → Backup dedup+compress → ~15 TB
Scenario B — Full Pipeline Pre-Backup
Dedup caveatApp/DB (100 TB) → PUCE compress+encrypt+sign (~22 TB) → Backup (dedup ~0%) → ~22 TB
Scenario C — Integrated in Backup Engine
Deep integrationApp/DB (100 TB) → Backup [Dedup → PUCE Engine (replaces compression) → PQ Encrypt] → ~10 TB
Scenario D — Post-Dedup, Pre-Storage
Ideal · Best overallApp/DB (100 TB) → Backup [Dedup → 40 TB] → PUCE Storage [ML-Select Compress → PQ Encrypt+Sign] → ~8 TB
| Scenario | Dedup works? | PQ Encrypt? | Integration | Ratio (100 TB) | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A · Compress-Only | ✓ Sim | ✗ Não | None | 6-7:1 | Reduce FETB licenses |
| B · Full Pipeline | ✗ ~0% | ✓ Sim | None | 4-5:1 | PQ end-to-end, no dedup |
| C · Motor Integrado | ✓ Sim | ✓ Sim | Deep (API) | 8-10:1 | Oracle RMAN, SQL Server |
| D · Pós-Dedup | ✓ Sim | ✓ Sim | Storage tier | 10-15:1 | Best possible ratio |
General Comparison — All Platforms
Integration method, recommended scenario and ratios for each backup system.
| Platform | PUCE integration method | Recommended scenario | Compression ratio (without PUCE → with PUCE) | Dedup works? | PQ Encrypt? | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle RMAN | SBT_TAPE library (libpuce_sbt.so) | C (Integrated Engine) | 2.1:1 → 9.3:1 | ✓ Excellent (block-aligned) | ✓ | Medium |
| Commvault | CVPySDK + Cloud Library S3 | A+D (Compress + Archive) | 2.5:1 → 10-15:1 | ✓ MSDP + PUCE | ✓ | Low-Medium |
| Veritas NetBackup | Hook scripts (bpstart/bpend_notify) + OST | D (Post-Dedup) | 2.5:1 → 10-15:1 | ✓ MSDP + PUCE | ✓ | Low-Medium |
| Dell NetWorker | Cloud Boost S3 / AFTD / Pre-save scripts | D (Data Domain + PUCE archive) | 2.0:1 → 10-14:1 | ✓ DD + PUCE | ✓ | Medium |
| Veeam B&R | S3 Object Storage Repository (native) | A+D (best cost-benefit) | 1.5:1 → 10-15:1 | ✓ MSDP + PUCE | ✓ | Low (plug & play) |
| SQL Server | VDI / BACKUP TO URL (S3) / .bak → PUCE | C (VDI) or A (BACKUP TO URL) | 1.8:1 → 7-10:1 | ✓ (8K pages repeat) | ✓ | Medium |
| PostgreSQL | pgBackRest S3 / pg_basebackup pipe / WAL archive | C (pgBackRest S3) | 2.3:1 → 6-9:1 | ✓ (WAL dedup excellent) | ✓ | Low |